I've still no plans to 'retire' as yet, because I'm very
happy to keep taking on interesting new work projects and therefore the earned income
should continue to roll in for as long as I want it to, or at least for as long
as the clients still want me to do the work ...
But there's a looming problem with future work possibilities,
in that the majority of the people I deal with in my core group of clients are,
like me, also getting older and at some stage they may decide to call it a day
themselves.
This has already happened with two former clients but not entirely
due to retirements - people also simply leave and move on to new pastures. The senior guys and gals I dealt with at
these places (senior in terms of their positions within the company) have
departed and, although these companies are still prospering, I'm just not on
the radar of the next generation of leaders now pulling the strings. Luckily, in recent years, neither of
these clients had been a particularly large contributor to my company's
turnover.
So although my company has provided me with a decent income
and also made a profit for twenty-odd consecutive years, it's prudent to be
planning for a time when most of the work might suddenly dry up, which could
happen whether I want to continue or not.
And looking at my company's future cashflow forecast, I can
remain employed and paying NI for another two full years even if all the work
dried up tomorrow, so the current finances are not in bad shape. This 'rolling' two years of future earned income
also means that monthly employer's contributions can continue to increase my
SIPP pot.
The SIPP currently represents around 1/3 of my total savings
and investments. The other 2/3 is in
ISAs and tax-sheltered bonds, and both the capital and income from these other investments
will be 100% tax-free to withdraw - they were purchased from taxed income so
I've effectively paid the tax on the way in rather than on the way out.
For the last two years, I've also been receiving a very
small pension from a defined benefits scheme to which I last made contributions
in 1992. This pension had been deferred since
that time, and I decided to take it many years earlier than the scheme's normal
retirement date.
A 25% lump sum from this provider went straight into the ISA
and, because this is a defined benefit scheme, the money purchase allowances
were not triggered so I can still continue to add to the SIPP without a £4,000
per year limit on contributions. However, I'm currently
being taxed on the regular annuity payments at the basic rate of income tax.
So, if the work was to dry up suddenly, then in two years time
I'd crystallise the SIPP and take the 25% lump sum from that too. The lump sum would be drip-fed into the ISA
over a period of a few years, and I'd likely immediately start to drawdown the
SIPP up to the limit of my personal tax allowance, not forgetting the small DB
pension payments, so I'd pay no income tax at all. The balance of the income I'd need in pre-SPA
retirement will be taken from the ISAs and other investments, which will also be
tax-free*.
*The alternative would
be to use the lump sum from the SIPP to supplement the first few years of retirement
income, instead of simultaneously drawing down against the non-pension assets. It might seem as if this is exactly the same thing as described above, but there may be benefits in getting all of the lump-sum under the protection of the ISA umbrella as soon as possible whilst drawing down the non-ISA (but still tax-free) assets. However, I think I'll wait and see what
the prevailing economic conditions are at the time, before I decide on this.
At the time I reach SPA, the SIPP pot could potentially
be 30-40% depleted, but drawdown from it will then be reduced accordingly so my
total taxable income, now including the state pension, remains below the
personal tax threshold prevailing at the time, and so I'd still pay no income
tax at all. And as before, the balance
of the income I'll need will be taken tax-free from the other investments.
It all sounds quite straightforward, but in reality I doubt
if there'll be a 'clean' retirement date when all my earned income simply stops forever and I'm required instantly to fall back on the investments.
What's much more probable is that the workflow will become
increasingly sporadic but I'll continue to be employed by my company. In these circumstances, I'm unlikely to be
able to avoid taxation altogether but the earned income alone will not be sufficient, and so the future mix of earned, pension and non-pension income will need to be balanced each year on an ad-hoc basis, to minimise
my overall tax liability.
No comments:
Post a Comment